Open Journal Systems

An appraisal of recurring grammar errors in Saudi premedical EFL learners’ academic writing

Mahboobeh Khaleghi, Mohammad Saleem, Mozaffar Mansoor, Mohammad Abdul Wajid

Article ID: 2077
Vol 6, Issue 2, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 342 (Abstract) 118 (PDF)

Abstract

The present research is a qualitative study investigating a potential relationship between explicit grammar instruction to adult EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners and the development of their writing skill. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach discourages explicit teaching of grammar at all levels as the theoretical premise in the approach is that learners are capable of imbibing grammar rules implicit in communication. However, adult EFL learners, taught English through CLT as an approach, are observed to make grammar errors in their writing, though they made progress in spoken English. In a qualitative study conducted with premedical students at a university in Saudi Arabia, the researchers find that explicit teaching of a few difficult-to-grasp grammar rules is required to improve learners’ writing skill since academic writing requires an advanced knowledge of grammar. A comparative analysis of learners’ writing samples and spoken English transcriptions showed that learners made numerous grammatical errors in their writings while the same group of learners made satisfactory progress in oral communication in English, despite making a few accent errors. The findings of the present research suggest that concerned EFL teachers need to make accommodations for grammar within communicative approach to explain certain grammar points explicitly, especially to adult learners, to take care of their writing skill, along with developing their communicative skills.


Keywords

communicative language teaching; English for medical studies; English for specific purpose; explicit grammar teaching; Saudi EFL environment; writing skill

Full Text:

PDF



References

Abahussain, M. O. (2016). Implementing Communicative Language Teaching Method in Saudi Arabia: Challenges Faced by Formative Year Teachers in State Schools [PhD thesis]. University of Stirling.

Asmari, A. A. A. (2015). Communicative Language Teaching in EFL University Context: Challenges for Teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(5), 976. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0605.09

Alharbi, A. O. (2022). Issues with Communicative Language Teaching Implementation in Saudi Arabia Concerning the Government Policy, Teachers, and Students: Two Decades of Research. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.28

Alharbi, H. (2018). Saudi EFL Students’ Use of Lexical Collocations in English Writing: A Corpus-Based Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3917873

Almohideb, N. (2019). Investigating Saudi Arabian teachers’ and students’ perspectives on teaching English by using the CLT Approach. University of Glasgow. https://doi.org/10.5525/GLA.THESIS.81760

Batawi, G. H. (2006). Exploring the Use of CLT in Saudi Arabia [Master’s thesis]. American University of Sharjah.

Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education.

Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. Pantheon Books.

Crystal, D. (2004). Rediscover Grammar. Pearson Longman.

Farooq, M. U. (2015). Creating a Communicative Language Teaching Environment for Improving Students’ Communicative Competence at EFL/EAP University Level. International Education Studies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n4p179

Frøisland, F. O., Fossumstuen, S. G., & Calafato, R. (2023). Explicit grammar instruction in the EFL classroom: studying the impact of age and gender. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0057

Harley, B., Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion and its implications for second language teaching. In: Davies A, Criper C, Howatt A (editors). Interlanguage. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 291-311.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press Inc.

Krashen, S. (2013). Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Applications, and Some Conjectures. Cambridge University Press.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009517

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. (1991). Focus on Form. Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, 39. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon

Long, M. (1998). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL 16(2): 35-49.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Pouresmaeil, A., & Vali, M. (2023). The effects of incidental focus on form on learning vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231185419

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532

Savage, K. L., Bitterlin, G., & Price, D. (2010). Grammar Matters: Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs. Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. (1997). Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Texts and Contexts in Second Language Learning. The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL Programmes in Quebec Primary Schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v7i1.557

Spada, N. (1997). Form-Focussed Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review of Classroom and Laboratory Research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444800012799

Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the Communicative Approach (2). ELT Journal, 39(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/39.2.76

Johns, A. M. (1986). The ESL Student and the Revision Process: Some Insights from Schema Theory. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.37514/jbw-j.1986.5.2.08

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (1999). What’s Wrong with Oral Grammar Correction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437

VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to Form and Content in the Input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009177

VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Vega, O. (2021). The role of grammar in ESL and EFL courses. TESL Ontario | CONTACT Magazine. 25-35.

Wajid, M. A., & Saleem, M. (2017). Learner conformity to Communicative Language Teaching Approach in EFL contexts: A case study in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(4), 240-249.

Wu, W. (2008). Misunderstandings of Communicative Language Teaching. English Language Teaching, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v1n1p50

Zeng, M. (2004). The Role of Grammatical Instruction within Communicative Language Teaching among Chinese ESL Students [Master’s thesis]. University of Windsor.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.2077
(342 Abstract Views, 118 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2024 Mahboobeh Khaleghi, Mohammad Saleem, Mozaffar Mansoor, Mohammad Abdul Wajid

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/