Open Journal Systems

The role of bell work assignments in expanding EFL learners’ vocabulary breadth

Saban Kara

Article ID: 2074
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 940 (Abstract) 65 (PDF)

Abstract

The expectations from the teachers have transformed radically in the 21st century, which necessitates using all moments of the lesson efficiently. In this regard, bell work assignments take precedence to make students revise previous topics as a warm-up activity while the teacher is completing official procedures such as attendance, writing lesson plans on the board, or preparing extra teaching tools. Although numerous studies have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of bell work assignments on a global scale, primarily in the USA, a gap in the literature has been realized in the Iraq context for EFL learners at the tertiary level. To this aim, 40 freshman students who were studying in the IT department at a private university in Erbil, Iraq, were chosen via snowball sampling to represent the experimental or control group. Experimental group students received their instruction with a bell-work-enriched format, whereas control group students followed the curriculum in an orthodox format. The data collection lasted 12 weeks in the spring semester of the 2022–2023 academic year in the Academic Debate and Critical Thinking course. Gathered data through vocabulary exams, interviews, and questionnaires revealed that bell work assignments offer tremendous opportunities to enhance vocabulary knowledge and develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills, apart from increasing motivation and concentration. The findings of this study can have practical implications for stakeholders who contemplate that bell work assignments can be used efficiently as a formative assessment instrument on a global scale.


Keywords

bell work; critical thinking; problem solving; vocabulary enhancement

Full Text:

PDF



References

Aldrup K, Carstensen B, Klusmann U (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3): 1177-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y

Alén E, Domínguez T, de Carlos P (2015). University student’ perceptions of the use of academic debates as a teaching methodology. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 16: 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.11.001

Burkhart H (2014). My Classroom Management Plan: The First Two Weeks of School [Master’s thesis]. University of Bowling Green State University.

Celik B, Kara S (2022). Students’ perceptions of the general English proficiency test: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 11(59): 10-20. doi: 10.34069/ai/2022.59.11.1

Cicek V, Tok H (2014). Effective use of lesson plans to enhance education in US and Turkish kindergarten thru 12th grade public school system: A comparative study. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(2), 10-20.

Conderman G, Pinter E, Young N (2020). Formative assessment methods for middle level classrooms. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(5): 233-240. doi: 10.1080/00098655.2020.1778615

Doup JR (2018). Bellwork as A Strategy to Increase Student’s Ability to Analyze Graph and Chart Data [Master’s thesis]. University of Montana.

Ghafar Z, Jalal SM, Bakr MM, et al. (2023). A comparative study of the advantages and disadvantages of using authentic materials and created materials for English language teaching. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 3(2): 43-57. doi: 10.53103/cjlls.v3i2.88

Hilden R, Oscarson AD, Yildirim A, et al. (2022). Swedish and Finnish pre-service teachers’ perceptions of summative assessment practices. Languages, 7(1): 10. doi: 10.3390/languages7010010

Ismail SM, Rahul DR, Patra I, et al. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4

James J (2016). ICT integration in academic writing: An experiment in blended learning. Arab World English Journal, 7(3): 336-355. doi: 10.24093/awej/vol7no3.24

Johnson TP (2014). Snowball sampling: Introduction. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Published online September 29. doi: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720

Kapici HO, Akcay H (2020). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 49(1): 76-98. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610

Kaya E (2015). The role of reading skills on reading comprehension ability of Turkish EFL students. ÜNİVERSİTEPARK Bülten, 4(1-2): 37-51. doi: 10.12973/unibulletin.412.4

Kemaloglu-Er E, Sahin MT (2022). Project-based learning in English language teaching at a rural school: A case study from Turkey. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 16(1), 34-55.

Klein L (2007). Auto-évaluation: Daily self-assessment in the FSL classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1): 181-199. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.64.1.181

Kwan F (2011). Formative assessment: The one-minute paper vs. the daily quiz. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5(1), 1-8.

Küçük T (2023). The power of body language in education: A study of teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(3). doi: 10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p275

Lingo ME, Williams-Diehm KL, Martin JE, et al. (2018). Teaching transition self-determination knowledge and skills using the ME! Bell Ringers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(3): 185-189. doi: 10.1177/2165143417753582

Luft JA, Navy SL, Wong SS, et al. (2022). The first 5 years of teaching science: The beliefs, knowledge, practices, and opportunities to learn of secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9): 1692-1725. doi: 10.1002/tea.21771

Mart CT (2013). A passionate teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 437-442.

Martinez C (2022). Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and learning through project-based curriculum. Cogent Education, 9(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186x.2021.2024936

Najar RL (2019). Strategy instruction and transfer in the EFL classroom. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 1(1): 123. doi: 10.18063/fls.v1i1.1086

Nejati R (2016). The durability of the effect of the frequent quizzes on Iranian high school students’ vocabulary learning. The International Journal of Humanities, 23(2), 29-42.

Nosirova D (2023). Learning English as a second language: Challenges and strategies. Modern Science and Research, 2(9), 165-170.

Öncül G (2017). Frequent testing: What are the real impacts of frequent quizzes on students, teachers, and instruction? Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1-19.

Östlund U, Kidd L, Wengström Y, et al. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3): 369-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005

Padilla-Walker LM (2006). The impact of daily extra credit quizzes on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4): 236-239. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3304_4

Palmer B (2011). From “BW” to learning. Science and Children, 48(5), 36-39.

Pilkington RM, Walker SA (2003). Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science, 31 (2), 41-63. doi: 10.1023/A:1022556401959

Poljičanin A, Čarić A, Vilović K, et al. (2009). Daily mini quizzes as means for improving student performance in anatomy course. Croatian Medical Journal, 50(1): 55-60. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.55

Popovych I, Semenov O, Semenova N, et al. (2022). Research of readiness of teachers of rural secondary schools for innovations. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 11(54): 84-93. doi: 10.34069/ai/2022.54.06.9

Sibanda J, Baxen J (2016). Determining ESL learners’ vocabulary needs from a textbook corpus: Challenges and prospects. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 34(1): 57-70. doi: 10.2989/16073614.2016.1159521

Tang W, Cui Y, Babenko O (2014). Internal consistency: Do we really know what it is and how to assess it. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 205-220.

Teng MF (2022). Incidental vocabulary learning from captioned videos: Learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2): 517-531. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12756

Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3): 398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048

Wallace J, Scanlon D, Calderón A (2022). Digital technology and teacher digital competency in physical education: A holistic view of teacher and student perspectives. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 14(3): 271-287. doi: 10.1080/25742981.2022.2106881

Wong H, Wong R, Rogers K, Brooks A (2012). Managing your classroom for success. Science and Children, 49(10), 60-64.

Wong HK (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638): 41-58. doi: 10.1177/019263650408863804

Yen TTN, Thao TTP (2021). The effects of extensive listening on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4). doi: 10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4753

Yucedal HM, Abdulrahman SA, Kara S (2022). Process-genre approach in teaching writing to language preparatory school students at a private university in Iraq. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(5). doi: 10.53103/cjess.v2i5.64

Yuksel İ (2011). Evaluation of foreign language learners’ lexical competence. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 36(1): 10-16. doi: 10.33225/pec/11.36.10

Zwiers J, Crawford M (2023). Academic Conversations. Published online October 5. doi: 10.4324/9781032680514


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i1.2074
(940 Abstract Views, 65 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Saban Kara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.